The following screed was rapped out in double-time by a dude who by rights should be working on his freelance assignment right now (the nature of which work, however, shall remain a secret here in deference to the time sensitivities of the no-doubt harried reader). Brian couldn't stop himself, so pissed was he with the ongoing attempt by the US government to blame every imaginable earthly ill on the politically created boogieman called "drugs." These comments, by the way, were sent directly to the esteemed representatives via their websites, despite the nagging suspicion by the author that the duo in question have been hopelessly brainwashed by the Christian Science ideology of the war on Americans, AKA the War on Drugs.
By the way, the efficient causes of this harangue (if one might wax philosophical for just a moment) were the superstitious tweets of one Alex Berenson which Brian, alas, read this morning, in which the prohibitionist author tweaked reformers for the problems that he blamed on marijuana legalization 1 . As usual, all the problems that he cited (to the extent that they were not just the figments of a nature-fearing imagination) were actually the result of the ongoing prohibition of all of marijuana's competitors. With this niggling impetus then -- and with the anxious knowledge of tomorrow's US Senate vote on the troglodytic HALT Act -- Brian could do nought else but expostulate, even if it meant that the poor guy would be up past midnight tonight catching up on that undefined freelancing work of his that I alluded to above.
Dear Senators
Prohibition has been the biggest mistake in American history. It is wrong root and branch. Our attitude towards "drugs" is prehistoric and anti-scientific. We come at the issue from the wrong direction. We should be awestruck at Nature's healing power (which God said was good) and be seeking all sorts of ways to use it safely and wisely. Instead, we believe that all psychoactive substances are bad -- without even asking for proof.
It is a self-fulfilling prophecy, which leads to folks seeking transcendence from a corrupted drug supply furnished by dealers interested in the bottom line.
Please end this folly. We need an amendment that prohibits prohibition -- which causes death and sorrow and denies godsend medicines to the distressed. Even now, in America's hysterical attempt to blame opioids for every evil under the sun, we are denying godsend pain medicine to kids in hospice --based on our superstitious belief in the evil of opiates. Opium was considered a godsend by Avicenna, Galen and Paracelsus. It is not evil. Bad social policies are evil.
FREE SCIENCE. Stop the NIDA campaign to make us think that drugs can only be used for evil. It is propaganda, not science, because they completely ignore the reason people use "drugs": in order to transcend self and improve their lives. That is the truth. NIDA 2 is all about ignoring that fact.
The Drug War has led to the election of Drug Warriors like Trump by jailing hundreds of thousands of blacks. If unchecked, the Drug War will completely destroy America. It is not wrong in parts -- it is wrong ROOT AND BRANCH. It is a WRONG WAY OF LOOKING AT THE WORLD!!!!!!!!!!!!
No wonder it leads to chaos, inner-city deaths, and the end of the rule of law in Latin America!!!!
Please vote NO ON HALT
May 24, 2023
"The biggest mistake in American history." Well, slavery was worse. (Remember, the old boy wrote this in a hurry.) That said, however, the Drug War can be seen as the extension of slavery by other means, as the book Whiteout makes abundantly clear.
Author's Follow-up: January 9, 2025
Protesting the Drug War is frustrating for anyone who has seen through the racist and anti-democratic project. It is as if one lives in a world wherein logic applies except in the case of cats, a world in which everyone is convinced that cats are demons. Where does one begin in changing minds? You can't just say that, "No, cats are NOT demons." That's not going to convince any true believer in the reigning superstition. So you're forced to backtrack to Philosophy 101 and broach topics like, what makes a cat a cat and what makes a demon a demon and start creating logically undeniable syllogisms to distinguish the two.
Also, here's another "biggest mistake" in American history: our decision to go ahead with the development of thermonuclear weapons in the 1950s, rather than seeking to outlaw them entirely and launching a multi-billion-dollar campaign to increase compassion worldwide with the strategic use of entheogens. But that solution, unfortunately, is just common sense, and common sense is at a premium in the superstitious age of the Drug War. Just ask the materialists who cannot figure out if laughing gas could help the depressed3.
For anyone who doubts the enormity of this mistake regarding nukes, I suggest a little bedtime reading in the form of "nuclear war 456 : A Scenario" by Annie Jacobsen7.
What we've really got to outlaw, of course, are horses! When Christopher Reeves was disabled by one of those dangerous equines, we should have been asking: who was peddling that junk? From whom had Christopher bought that horse?! He should have been given 20 years at minimum for dealing in death!
See? I can become just as indignant as any Drug Warrior. Humph! Of course, I am a moderate. I do not believe with our Horse Czar that horse dealers should be beheaded -- that is going a bit too far, perhaps -- but they should certainly do some serious time! Humph!
Oh, it feels so good to be morally indignant. But we should not let Drug Warriors have all the fun. Let's get indignant about all people who deal in death: those who sell alcohol, for instance, and skateboards! Humph! Oh, the ecstasies of a just indignation!
You too can ride the prohibitionist's indignation bandwagon. Find out how here: .
Support the goal of the Partnership for a Death Free America. We are aiming for a Death-Free country by the year 2030! We need YOUR indignation to reach our goal! Tell Congress that you're not going to tolerate this anymore! End the madness! Outlaw all the many unregulated threats that could kill any one of our innocent little white children even as we speak! I say again, humph!
Author's Follow-up:
I need scarcely add that the HALT act was passed. The troglodytes in Congress still believe that health issues in America should be handled by the police. What a fascist idea! Until I studied the Drug War, I had my own reservations about national healthcare. Then I found that the harshest opponents of that measure were all in favor of spending trillions on health -- it's just that they wanted the money to go to the military and police forces. We could spend a fraction of that money on establishing a system of pharmacologically savvy empaths around the country who could advise on the safest and wisest uses for psychoactive medicine -- in a world in which all substances were legal once again and in which we frowned only on uneducated drug use -- not on drug use in general. After all, drug use created the Hindu religion. It was created thanks to the inspiration and elation provided by the psychoactive drug (or drugs) known as Soma. It follows from this statement that it is the violation of religious liberty to outlaw substances that inspire and elate.
Many people take antidepressants believing their depression has a biochemical cause. Research does not support this belief. --Dr. Noam Shpancer, Psychology Today
First we outlaw all drugs that could help; then we complain that some people have 'TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION'. What? No. What they really "have" is an inability to thrive because of our idiotic drug laws.
3:51 PM · Jul 15, 2024
William James knew that there were substances that could elate. However, it never occurred to him that we should use such substances to prevent suicide. It seems James was blinded to this possibility by his puritanical assumptions.
No drug causes addiction after one use. From this fact alone, it follows that even drugs like meth and crack and Fentanyl can be used wisely -- on an intermittent basis.
What I want to know is, who sold Christopher Reeves that horse that he fell off of? Who was peddling that junk?!
I have dissed MindMed's new LSD "breakthrough drug" for philosophical reasons. But we can at least hope that the approval of such a "de-fanged" LSD will prove to be a step in the slow, zigzag path toward re-legalization.
There is an absurd safety standard for "drugs." The cost/benefit analysis of the FDA & co. never takes into account the costs of NOT prescribing nor the benefits of a productive life well lived. The "users" are not considered stakeholders.
Musk and co. want to make us more robot-like with AI, when they should be trying to make us more human-like with sacred medicine. Only humans can gain creativity from plant medicine. All AI can do is harvest the knowledge that eventually results from that creativity.
Amphetamines are "meds" when they help kids think more clearly but they are "drugs" when they help adults think more clearly. That shows you just how bewildered Americans are when it comes to drugs.
And so, by ignoring all "up" sides to drugs, the DEA points to potential addiction as a knock-down argument for their prohibition. This is the logic of children (and uneducated children at that). It is a cost-benefit analysis that ignores all benefits.
(up)