bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter


Case Studies in Wise Drug Use

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher

January 7, 2025



Drug War propaganda has taught us since childhood that it is impossible to use psychoactive substances safely, and that these drugs have no positive uses in any case. These are two enormous lies.

Latest update


Here are a variety of case studies from a utopian world in which drugs are legal again and society is dedicated to learning how to use them safely for the psychological and spiritual benefit of humankind.

Case Studies in Wise Drug Use


Keith: Keith is a sullen teenager who was recently 'outed' by his schoolmates for drawing up plans to 'shoot up' the high school. He was removed from school temporarily and put in intensive entheogen therapy with empathic counselors, using a variety of phenethylamines inspired by Alexander Shulgin. He has been learning compassion, not through words but through actual feelings.

Cedric: Cedric is a teenager who was contemplating suicide. He has been given a laughing gas kit as a sort of epi pen for the depressed. He is instructed to use it whenever he begins to have suicidal thoughts. Meanwhile, he is in weekly group therapy in which he meets with fellow teenagers to talk while the group is under the influence of drugs that inspire and create feelings of bliss. He is thereby learning, experientially, that life can be good and that there is such a thing as meaning and hope -- not by listening to the 'words, words, words' of psychoanalytic theory, but by leapfrogging all the theoretical protocols and learning from actual experience. His mood is not just buoyed by drug use, but by the health-improving anticipation of such use.

Sally: Sally does not use psychoactive drugs on a daily basis, with the exception of coffee. But she is a big music fan and loves using phenethylamines every once in a while to appreciate music more deeply. She finds that her drug experiences help her hear music more powerfully, even when she is not actually 'under the influence.'

Bob: Bob is an academic whose livelihood depends on his frequent publication of well-researched and annotated papers. He is, however, prone to gloomy procrastination. He is working with a pharmacologically savvy empath1 2 to help him use a variety of cognition-enhancing drugs while avoiding becoming dependent on any single one of them. He no longer procrastinates and has improved mood thanks to the virtuous circle of vocational success that his increased productivity has created for him.

Joe: Joe is a comedian who was near to self-destructing on stage thanks to self-doubt, which, of course, seriously degraded his public performances. A pharmacologically savvy empath is helping him to choose a variety of drugs that help him to perform energetically and without stage fright, thereby creating a virtuous circle of success for Joe while yet steering him clear of unwanted dependency.

Philomena: Philomena is a 60-year-old philosopher who obtains great philosophical and religious insights from smoking opium and has decided to use the substance nightly, in the same way that her friends use antidepressants daily.

Len: Len is a nature lover who joins a group once every month to go out together in nature under the influence of morphine. The drug gives the group an enormously increased appreciation of the detailed and ornate harmony of the natural world around them, which the group enjoys discussing as they take this monthly 'enchanted hike' together.

Herbert: Herbert ignored all the public service announcements and school courses about discussing drug use with pharmacologically savvy empaths. He has become dependent on a substance that he no longer enjoys using. He has therefore started working with such an empath on plan to incrementally replace the unwanted drug with a variety of new drugs whose effects he does enjoy. The transition will take about a year and will involve no gnashing of teeth, because unlike today's drug rehab, there is no effort to turn Herbert into a drug-free Christian Scientist, merely to help him achieve his psychosocial goals in life.

Sal: Sal is a philosopher who gets together once a month with other philosophers to discuss philosophical matters while smoking opium.

Bob: Bob uses opium every weekend, the better to enjoy classical music concerts.

Anne: Anne is a rock star who wants to be ecstatic on stage so that she can reach new musical heights and thus make a living. She considers herself just like the Grecian oracles of yore who cultivated ecstatic states in order to perform THEIR jobs. She has consulted a pharmacologically savvy empath to help her choose and schedule a wide variety of inspirational substances for use at various concerts, such that she can perform with the necessary self-forgetfulness while yet not developing an unwanted dependency upon any one substance.


How can this state of safe and wise use come about? Easy. We simply have to start teaching kids from grade school that the only evils are unwanted dependency and obvious toxicity. That's it. Drugs in themselves are not evil, only a lack of knowledge about them is evil. And it is, of course, precisely this lack of knowledge that the Drug Warrior says should be public policy. It is a disgrace that a supposedly free and scientific country would champion such willful ignorance.

You will notice that many of my case studies involve the use of opium. I chose this drug on purpose since it has been so thoroughly demonized in the public mind as to have virtually disappeared from public discourse. We have been programmed into forgetting that the drug even exists, despite the fact that it was considered a panacea by ancient physicians. Yet it is psychological common sense that opium can have beneficial uses -- that almost all psychoactive drugs can have potential beneficial uses, at some dose, for some people, in some circumstance, at some time, etc.

The reader should be able to imagine many other case studies about beneficial drug use that will be possible once we jettison our dogmatic insistence that drugs are evil. Many of them will involve psychedelics, yes, but it is important that we do not limit ourselves to benefitting from psychedelics alone, since to do so is to agree with the Drug Warrior that some drugs are, indeed, bad. That's simply wrong. Ignorance is bad, not drugs.

Indeed, the world is our pharmacological oyster once we stop ignorantly demonizing drugs and start learning how to use them wisely instead.

There is no doubt that far, far less death will result from such a policy than that which comes about from prohibition, the policy which created the Mafia as we know it today. Re-legalizing drugs will mean the end of drug lords and civil wars overseas and drive-by shootings. Yes, there are those who will suffer from this new freedom thanks to their own immaturity and idiocy, but if that's a reason to outlaw drugs, then we should outlaw drinking and car driving for the exact same reason. The most we can do, the most that we NEED to do, is to teach honestly about drugs and to stop obsessing about misuse, but to show Americans examples of wise use.

It's time for America to grow up and start using drugs for the benefit of humankind and end this crazy idea that drugs are evil and that society should encourage young people to be ignorant about them. I write for the countless millions who suffer in silence because they are not considered stakeholders on this topic, those forced to live a second-best life because racist politicians have outlawed godsend substances that grow at our very feet, some of which substances have inspired entire religions.

Here is where the materialist comes to the rescue of Big Pharma and the Drug War by claiming that drugs have not been proven to work in the way implied above, but that is a lie! The proof is extant. Drugs DO work to improve mind and mood. Scientists ignore this fact because they operate according to the principles of reductive materialism and behaviorism, according to which the actual experience of actual people is unimportant: all that counts is what scientists can discover under a microscope. This willful blindness to psychological common sense is, in turn, based on a category error: namely, the ruinous notion that materialists are the experts when it comes to mind and mood medicines, when in reality, the experts are empathic individuals with a knowledge of how drugs actually work from a human being's point of view -- not a Dr. Spock from the tellingly named National Institute of Drug Abuse, who comes to the table full of unspoken Christian Science biases against drug-aided mind therapy.

But the question is not, how can inspirational drugs help? The question is, how can they NOT? How can the creation of blissful and compassionate states NOT help the would-be suicide and the hothead? How can they NOT conduce to better music appreciation? How can they not inspire productive conversations and promote new creative literature, etc. etc.? The fact is that they do, if materialist science will only open its eyes and look past the censorship that has all but outlawed the publication of positive news about the politically created boogieman called 'drugs.'

The proof is extant. Drugs can help. If scientists cannot see this, they are simply the slow kid in the class and should not be allowed to hold up human progress with their dogmatic myopia. Let us proceed with human progress while they struggle to see what is staring them in the face.

The evidence for drug efficacy is found everywhere these days, albeit in sites and books that are pooh-poohed by the establishment. One can sift through the user accounts on Erowid or in the books of drug researchers like Grof, Grob, Fadiman, Winninger, Richards and Griffiths. Another resource are the works of Alexander Shulgin, the author and pharmacologist who helped develop MDMA and related empathogens. Here are some citations from that genius's 1980 lab book.

'We felt and expressed great love for one another, admired the light, the youth, and the softness we saw in each other's faces.'


Just imagine the therapeutic power of putting a sulky teenage hater in such a state of mind, especially when he or she is surrounded by fellow haters of his own age in a drug-aided therapy session guided by a highly empathic adult, one who knows about drugs, not just from reading books but by using and observing actual use and thereby learning what usage patterns actually work in the long run.

Or, imagine inspiring the following sentiments in a young would-be suicide, who sees naught but grayness in the rainbow of life's possibilities:

'It was a marvelous day, full of euphoria, beauty, and marvelous feelings for all present. The typical glow, softening of features, and ease of communication was everywhere present.'


To say that such drug-induced states could not have any therapeutic value for the suicidal and the angry is just willful nonsense.

As far as music appreciation is concerned, Shulgin himself said the following after listening to Mahler's 1st 'under the influence':

'The powerful finale of the symphony ended with God saying to me, 'Trust Me, trust Me.''


This is how people actually feel under the influence, it is how drugs actually WORK in the real world. We do not need endless studies by the FDA to say that drugs can work in a variety of holistic therapeutic ways, the proof is extant. They have worked and they can work. But that is a conclusion that drug researchers dogmatically ignore, and for two reasons: 1) in order to toe the line with the Drug War ideology of substance demonization and 2) to remain in lockstep with academic orthodoxy which falsely maintains that the world of mind and mood is best understood by a behaviorist approach, which ignores all obvious emotional indications and looks under a microscope for efficacy instead. According to that orthodoxy, common sense means nothing: the scientists are the ones who will tell us when we are happy and when we are not, thank you very much. They are the ones who will tell us how to cure depression, and believe me, they will not be giving us insight-creating drugs to attain that end.

Of course, the longevity of this willful blindness is easily understood. There is a lot of money riding on the status quo, and so scientists and Drug Warriors alike are going to do all they can to keep us from acknowledging psychological common sense. That's why I created this whole website: because the prevalence of these false beliefs is rotting the American mind. Someone has to push back. Someone has to point out that we are ignoring the obvious. Someone has to say that the emperors are wearing no lab coats, that they are, in fact, stymying human progress with their myopic scientism, not advancing it.

Incidentally, this essay illustrates the fact-free fanaticism of the Chicken Little Drug Warrior in teaching us to fear drugs: Shulgin experimented regularly and for a lifetime with psychoactive medicine and he did not fry his brain: to the contrary, he left behind a legacy of hints that are hidden in plain sight about how drugs could be used beneficially by humanity rather than being turned into the whipping boy for social problems. But Drug Warriors know what they're doing. They have no interest in stopping suicides, nor in preventing school shootings. Least of all do they care about inspiring great literature, a love of nature, or philosophical insights. Their goal is to use baseless fearmongering to abnegate the hard-won freedoms of democracy that were enumerated in the Declaration of Independence. You remember the Declaration of Independence? That's the document that Ronald Reagan officially rendered null and void when he ordered the DEA to stomp onto Monticello in 1987 and confiscate Thomas Jefferson's poppy plants in violation of everything he stood for, politically speaking.



Author's Follow-up: January 8, 2025

picture of clock metaphorically suggesting a follow-up



One example not listed above would involve the use of entheogens and psychedelics to fight PTSD. This is something that the FDA is shamelessly preventing by continuing to insist that MDMA use is 'risky' while yet approving of Big Pharma meds whose published side effects include death itself3! It is psychological common sense that psychedelics and other entheogens and entactogens can be leveraged to change the negative autonomic reactions associated with that condition. But the slow kid in the room, i.e., the reductive materialist, cannot figure that out. Why not? Because he or she has a previous commitment to the hateful emotion-free principles of behaviorism.

Let's also be clear: psychoactive drugs in themselves are not the answer. They do not work like Pepto-Bismol. They cannot be presumed to cause the same effect in different people without reference to a wide array of influential circumstances.

The ability of any one specific person to benefit from a given drug involves a host of variables: including that person's education level, their goals in life, their view about the world, and their emotional state at the precise time of usage, etc. Then too there is dosage, the immediate environment, the time of day... in other words, all the details that Drug Warriors scrupulously ignore. Drug warriors do not want to hear any details. They do not want to disseminate any knowledge. They want to instill fear instead.

This is why some of the above case examples assume the presence of what I call a pharmacologically savvy empath. This is an educated, empathic individual who is personally familiar with drugs and can choose among a vast pharmacopoeia of psychoactive substances for therapeutic use based on circumstances and the empath's ideally profound knowledge of human personality types, etc. In other words, this 'PSE' is a kind of expert that has yet to be acknowledged in the west, but one which has many things in common with the curandero of the Andes. They will employ drugs in the interests of holistically improving behaviors and attitudes.

In the utopia imagined above, the billions that the Drug Warrior spends today on propaganda and censorship will instead go to ad campaigns and school courses that emphasize the need for knowledge and responsibility, without constantly harping on 'drugs' as a boogieman. It is precisely those hysterical campaigns that give kids ideas about using drugs irresponsibly. We need to just shut the hell up about drugs and guide people who are interested in drug use (presumably every adult except for Christian Scientists) to reliable information and safe supply. Meanwhile, the media needs to start covering drug deaths in the way that they cover car accidents, without turning their stories into a morality tale about the supposed evil of psychoactive substances.

Let's hope that someday, people will be pressured into using drugs that inspire compassion. Barring divine intervention, that is surely the only way that our world is going to avoid nuclear annihilation.

It's funny, though, I keep running into people who exude a moral air and say things like, 'Well, I personally, have no need for drugs.'

Firstly, that is THEIR opinion. It could be that their abrasive personality is rubbing their neighbors the wrong way and so they have an obligation to change that with drug use -- just as a smelly person has an obligation to use deodorant. Then, too, such people probably drink alcohol and coffee and/or take antidepressants daily -- so their seeming disdain for drugs is hypocritical.

But the real question is, why would they NOT want to use drugs, at least on occasion? Why would they not want to improve their ability to appreciate music and the world around them? Why would they not want to see beyond the Veil of Maya and gain insights about Reality writ large? Why would they not want to improve their ability to contemplate the world and to communicate more effectively about it?

Either such people do not value self-improvement or they believe one or more of the many lies of the Drug Warriors, such as the idea that addictive drugs have to be used addictively or that drug use is morally wrong. That latter viewpoint is a religious tenet, by the way, and if folks are going to demur on that basis, they could at least have the honesty to tell us so, to say unequivocally that: 'I am a Christian Scientist when it comes to drugs, so I feel that it is immoral to use them.'

I would not agree with them but at least I could respect their honesty. Instead, most people who say they 'have no need' of drugs merely evince a kind of disdain for use, one that testifies to the fact that they have been brainwashed since childhood in the drug-hating ideology of the Drug War. The truth is, they have been turned into drug-hating Christian Scientists by drug-war propaganda, and the least they can do is to acknowledge that fact!

Finally, why would one 'just say no' to a pharmacopoeia that we have yet to even
locate and investigate? Surely, that is premature. The world is full of psychoactive medicines of whose potential the west is only now beginning to become vaguely aware. The ethnobotanical work of Richard Schultes in 'Plants of the Gods' provides but a tantalizing glimpse of the treasure trove of psychoactive medicines that Mother Nature has to offer if only we would stop deriding such substances in advance and investigate them with the interest of a suffering humanity in mind.

What's that? You say that it's wrong to glamorize drugs? Wake up, please. The Vedic scriptures are all about glamorizing drugs. The Vedic and hence the Hindu religion exists today thanks to the inspiration gleaned from the consumption of the psychedelic Soma.

Besides, this is a world in which we glamorize drinking, driving, mountain climbing, and horseback riding. 100,000 are injured every year in that latter activity alone. Yet horseback riding is shamelessly glorified in every western ever produced. And yet it's wrong to glamorize the use of medicines like coca and opium that have inspired entire religions. I sense a hidden agenda here, Mr. or Mrs. Drug Warrior.

Basically, here's the thing. If you're still disagreeing with me at this point, you need to see one of those experts who helps tear brainwashed people away from cults, for the Drug War is nothing but a superstitious cult teaching its devotees to scorn the bounty of Mother Nature, that same Mother Nature which the Christian god himself told us was good.

Teach, don't demonize; educate, don't arrest.

Stop using the Drug War as an excuse to destroy American freedoms.



Author's Follow-up: April 1, 2025

picture of clock metaphorically suggesting a follow-up




Most readers have been brainwashed to believe that drugs have no positive uses. Let me remind them, therefore, that the Hindu religion was inspired by drug use. See the many positive references to the use of the psychoactive Soma in Hindu scriptures, such as the following in the Rig Veda. Remember in reading them that 15-year-olds like Niomi Russell4 are being killed today because America refuses to recognize the positive side of drug use -- which, as these citations clearly imply, is a sign of deep religious intolerance.


Positive Drug Use in Vedic Scripture 5


"The singer of their praise awaits whatever grace the Ashvins give, Who save when Soma gladdens them."

"Thus in the Soma, in wild joy the Brahman hath exalted thee."

"The mighty flowing Soma-draught, brought by the Hawk, hath gladdened thee."

"The Soma juice inspires us, and we are guided by the tradition received from our ancestors."

"Sacrifices and libations of Soma juice give him complete power to perform his great deeds."

"These songs, O Soma-drinker, cheered by Soma, Indra, accept from thy most zealous poet."

"So drink thou of the savoury juice. Indra, whom many laud, accept the strength-conferring Soma juice. Quaff, pour down drink that satisfies."



Pharmacologically Savvy Empaths




In an ideal world, we would replace psychiatrists with what I call pharmacologically savvy empaths, compassionate healers with a vast knowledge of psychoactive substances from around the world and the creativity to suggest a wide variety of protocols for their safe use as based on psychological common sense. By so doing, we would get rid of the whole concept of 'patients' and 'treat' everybody for the same thing: namely, a desire to improve one's mind and mood. But the first step toward this change will be to renounce the idea that materialist scientists are the experts when it comes to mind and mood medicine in the first place. This is a category error. The experts on mind and mood are real people with real emotion, not physical doctors whose materialist bona fides dogmatically require them to ignore all the benefits of drugs under the belief that efficacy is to be determined by looking under a microscope.

This materialism blinds such doctors to common sense, so much so that it leads them to prefer the suicide of their patient to the use of feel-good medicines that could cheer that patient up in a trice. For the fact that a patient is happy means nothing to the materialist doctor: they want the patient to 'really' be happy -- which is just their way of saying that they want a "cure" that will work according to the behaviorist principles to which they are dedicated as modern-day materialists. Anybody could prescribe a drug that works, after all: only a big important doctor can prescribe something that works according to theory. Sure, the prescription has a worse track record then the real thing, but the doctor's primary job is to vindicate materialism, not to worry about the welfare of their patient. And so they place their hands to their ears as the voice of common sense cries out loudly and clearly: "You could cheer that patient up in a jiffy with a wide variety of medicines that you have chosen to demonize rather than to use in creative and safe ways for the benefit of humankind!" I am not saying that doctors are consciously aware of this evil --merely that they are complicit in it thanks to their blind allegiance to the inhumane doctrine of behaviorism.

This is the sick reality of our current approach. And yet everybody holds this mad belief, this idea that medical doctors should treat mind and mood conditions.

How do I know this?

Consider the many organizations that are out to prevent suicide. If they understood the evil consequences of having medical doctors handle our mind and mood problems, they would immediately call for the re-legalization of drugs and for psychiatrists to morph into empathizing, drug-savvy shamans. Why? Because the existing paradigm causes totally unnecessary suicides: it makes doctors evil by dogmatically requiring them to withhold substances that would obviously cheer one up and even inspire one (see the uplifting and non-addictive meds created by Alexander Shulgin, for instance). The anti-suicide movement should be all about the sane use of drugs that elate. The fact that it is not speaks volumes about America's addiction to the hateful materialist mindset of behaviorism.

More proof? What about the many groups that protest brain-damaging shock therapy? Good for them, right? but... why is shock therapy even necessary? Because we have outlawed all godsend medicines that could cheer up almost anybody "in a trice." And why do we do so? Because we actually prefer to damage the brain of the depressed rather than to have them use drugs. We prefer it! Is this not the most hateful of all possible fanaticisms: a belief about drugs that causes us to prefer suicide and brain damage to drug use? Is it really only myself who sees the madness here? Is there not one other philosopher on the planet who sees through the fog of Drug War propaganda to the true evil that it causes?

This is totally unrecognized madness -- and it cries out for a complete change in America's attitude, not just toward drugs but toward our whole approach to mind and mood. We need to start learning from the compassionate holism of the shamanic world as manifested today in the cosmovision of the Andes. We need to start considering the human being as an unique individual and not as an interchangeable widget amenable to the one-size-fits-all cures of reductionism. The best way to fast-track such change is to implement the life-saving protocol of placing the above-mentioned pharmacologically savvy empaths in charge of mind and mood and putting the materialist scientists back where they belong: in jobs related to rocket chemistry and hadron colliders. We need to tell the Dr. Spocks of psychology that: "Thanks, but no thanks. We don't need your help when it comes to subjective matters, thank you very much indeed. Take your all-too-logical mind back to the physics lab where it belongs."

  • Addicted to Addiction
  • Addicted to Ignorance
  • Addiction
  • After the Drug War
  • After the Drug War part 2
  • Another Cry in the Wilderness
  • Assisted Suicide and the War on Drugs
  • Beta Blockers and the Materialist Tyranny of the War on Drugs
  • Brahms is NOT the best antidepressant
  • Case Studies in Wise Drug Use
  • Common Sense Drug Withdrawal
  • Declaration of Independence from the War on Drugs
  • Drug Use as Self-Medication
  • Drugs are not the enemy, hatred is the enemy
  • Ego Transcendence Made Easy
  • Elderly Victims of Drug War Ideology
  • Four reasons why Addiction is a political term
  • Getting off antidepressants in the age of the Drug War
  • Goodbye Patient, Hello Client
  • Harold & Kumar Support the Drug War
  • Heroin versus Alcohol
  • How Cocaine could have helped me
  • How drug prohibition destroys the lives of the depressed
  • How Drug Prohibition Leads to Excessive Drinking and Smoking
  • How Psychiatry and the Drug War turned me into an eternal patient
  • How the Drug War Blinds us to Godsend Medicine
  • How the Drug War is a War on Creativity
  • How the Drug War Killed Amy Winehouse
  • How The Drug War Killed Andy Gibb
  • How the Drug War Punishes the Elderly
  • How the Myth of Mental Illness supports the War on Drugs
  • How to Unite Drug War Opponents of all Ethnicities
  • Hypocritical America Embraces Drug War Fascism
  • In Praise of Doctor Feelgood
  • In Praise of Drug Dealers
  • In Praise of Thomas Szasz
  • Let's Hear It For Psychoactive Therapy
  • Medications for so-called 'opioid-use disorder' are legion
  • Notes about the Madness of Drug Prohibition
  • Open Letter to Dr. Carl L. Hart
  • Open Letter to Erowid
  • Open Letter to Gabrielle Glaser
  • Open Letter to Lisa Ling
  • Pihkal 2.0
  • Replacing 12-Step Programs with Shamanic Healing
  • Replacing Psychiatry with Pharmacologically Savvy Shamanism
  • Science is not free in the age of the Drug War
  • Shannon Information and Magic Mushrooms
  • Someone you love is suffering unnecessarily because of the War on Drugs
  • Thank God for Erowid
  • Thank God for Soul Quest
  • THE ANTI DRUG WAR BLOG
  • The Drug War and Armageddon
  • The Great Philosophical Problem of Our Time
  • The Mother of all Western Biases
  • The Muddled Metaphysics of the Drug War
  • The Myth of the Addictive Personality
  • The New Age of Pharmacological Serfdom
  • The Origins of Modern Psychiatry
  • The Philosophical Idiocy of the Drug War
  • The real reason for depression in America
  • Using Opium to Fight Depression
  • What Jim Hogshire Got Wrong about Drugs
  • Why America's Mental Healthcare System is Insane
  • Why Americans Prefer Suicide to Drug Use
  • Why Louis Theroux is Clueless about Addiction and Alcoholism
  • Why Scientists Should Not Judge Drugs


    • Notes:

    1: psychologically-savvy empath: this is an empathic individual with a knowledge of drugs and their use based on real experience, someone who recognizes psychological common sense and can advise on protocols that meet user goals while avoiding unwanted dependency. (up)
    2: Replacing Psychiatry with Pharmacologically Savvy Shamanism (up)
    3: Why the FDA is not qualified to judge psychoactive medicine (up)
    4: Niomi Russell Killed By Drive-By Shooters In Southeast DC (up)
    5: The Rig Veda (up)







    Ten Tweets

    against the hateful war on US




    A law proposed in Colorado in February 2024 would have criminalized positive talk about drugs online. What? The world is on the brink of nuclear war because of hate-driven politics, and I can be arrested for singing the praises of empathogens?

    Before anyone receives shock therapy, they should have the option to start using opium daily instead and/or any other natural drug that makes them feel good and keeps them calm. Any natural drug is better than knowingly damaging the brain!!!

    Hollywood presents cocaine as a drug of killers. In reality, strategic cocaine use by an educated person can lead to great mental power, especially as just one part of a pharmacologically balanced diet.

    And where did politicians get the idea that irresponsible white American young people are the only stakeholders when it comes to the question of re-legalizing drugs??? There are hundreds of millions of other stakeholders: philosophers, pain patients, the depressed.

    Over 45% of traumatic brain injuries are caused by horseback riding (ABC News). Tell your representatives to outlaw horseback riding and make it a federal offence to teach a child how to ride! Brought to you by the Partnership for a Death Free America.

    There are a potentially vast number of non-addictive drugs that could be used strategically in therapy. They elate and "free the tongue" to help talk therapy really work. Even "addictive" drugs can be used non-addictively, prohibitionist propaganda notwithstanding.

    I'm grateful to the folks who are coming out of the woodwork at the last minute to deface their own properties with "Trump 2024" signs. Now I'll know who to thank should Trump get elected and sell us out to Putin.

    The goal of drug-law reform should be to outlaw prohibition. Anything short of that, and our basic rights will always be subject to veto by fearmongers. Outlawing prohibition would restore the Natural Law of Jefferson, which the DEA scorned in 1987 with its raid on Monticello.

    Harm Reduction is not enough. We need Benefit Production as well. The autistic should be able to use compassion-enhancing drugs; dementia patients should be able to use the many drugs that improve and speed up mental processes.

    Peyote advocates should be drug legalization advocates. Otherwise, they're involved in special pleading which is bound to result in absurd laws, such as "Plant A can be used in a religion but not plant B," or "Person A can belong to such a religion but person B cannot."


    Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






    Drug War Propaganda from Hollywood
    Drugs are not the enemy, hatred is the enemy


    Copyright 2025 abolishthedea.com, Brian Quass

    (up)