
Anyone familiar with the philosophies of both Immanuel Kant and William James should understand that philosophers have a duty to investigate what we westerners call 'altered states' and hence have a duty to disdainfully deride and denounce the outlawing of psychoactive substances. Kant's basic message, as inspired by Hume, is that we cannot understand ultimate realities in words, but as James insists in "The Varieties of Religious Experience," it is our duty as philosophers to try to understand such realities EXPERIENTIALLY, i.e., with the help of psychoactive substances such as nitrous oxide.
"No account of the universe in its totality," wrote James, "can be final which leaves these other forms of consciousness quite disregarded."
This is why it is a shame that I am the only philosopher in the world who contacted the FDA to protest their recent plans to begin treating nitrous oxide as a "drug" and so further discourage its use in metaphysical research. Alas, such goal-driven substance use is already considered unthinkable by most academics thanks to their brainwashed fealty to the Drug War ideology of substance demonization. Thus I was the only philosopher in the world who spoke up on behalf of the legacy of William James and on behalf of academic freedom, for that matter, by pleading with the FDA to refrain from further marginalizing an already vastly underused substance. (In a sane world, the suicidal would be given laughing gas kits in the same way that we provide epi pens for those with severe allergies.)
But then this is the point of my entire website and the hundreds of essays that it contains: to demonstrate to the world that the Drug War and prohibition are a cancer on the body politic and not just a matter of a few laws set up to discourage hedonists. For the idea that we should hate psychoactive substances is itself a metaphysical notion peculiar to the western mindset and not some logical truth that any unbiased mind must accept. Unfortunately, scientists seem to know, as it were subconsciously, that the Drug War is a good thing, for it is clearly biased in the name of the materialism which they themselves profess. In the wake of the technological revolution, science is feeling omniscient, and so it naturally wants to avoid dealing with drug effects and the variability of human emotions. They cannot be quantified, as behaviorist materialism requires. So philosophers and scientists alike see a benefit in drug laws that outlaw substances that facilitate mystical feelings and ontological intimations: "Good riddance to such namby-pamby data," says the materialist in their "heart of hearts."
And so the Drug War outlaws precisely those substances whose use conduces to a non-materialist view of the world, one in which we have intimations about the supposedly "unknowable" world of the noumena. And why is the noumena unknowable to us? First, thanks to the merely pragmatic nature of our perceptions as explained by Kant. But also thanks to the inherent limitations of that incomplete and fallible communication system that we call human language, whose inevitable shortcomings and vagaries seem to bar us from definitively saying anything that could not, at least in theory, be plausibly gainsaid in that same inherently malleable language.
These limitations of human language contrast tellingly, however, with the vivid experiential convictions about reality that are communicated by substance use according to the trip reports of the psychonauts of all ages. We can debate the ontological significance of such experiences, of course, but let us remember that it was precisely such "use" that opened James' mind to a world of potential realities of whose existence he had previously been blissfully unaware. Why? Because of his previous self-satisfied acceptance of materialist principles.
Unfortunately, modern philosophers have ceded their job of metaphysical investigation to psychonauts like James Fadiman, Alex Gibbons and Jim Hogshire. Not that there is anything wrong with the research of these latter truth seekers, but it is a shame that philosophers are not working with them to promote human progress and philosophical understanding. And so if metaphysics is dead in the 21st century, it is because today's philosophers have abandoned the pursuit of truth in the name of supporting America's hateful and superstitious war on psychoactive substances.
According to Kant, we can know nothing about the noumenal world, or ultimate reality, but this claim is not true*. In making that claim, Kant was unaware of the metaphysical insights provided by psychoactive drug use. There is such a thing as "experiential proof" inspired by such use -- an absolute conviction that is felt "in every fiber of one's being," as opposed to having been "proven" for one syllogistically in the fallible and eternally insufficient communication method that we call human language.
This is Kant's Holy Grail, had he only realized it, a way to move forward with metaphysical research: by looking for experiential proof of ultimate realities rather than merely logical ones.
A critic might say, yes, but metaphysics cannot be based on experience. But by that word, one has always meant sober experience. That implicit qualification was itself established before we understood the fallibility of the senses. The transcendent experience I reference here is of another kind, being contemplated in the mind and not processed through the sense organs typically associated with experience.
*Kant's claim could be salvaged, perhaps, by specifying the type of "knowledge" that we're talking about here. My point is simply that Kant seemed unaware of the power of psychoactive drugs to inspire states that provide us with convictions with respect to the noumenal world. Whether the source of those convictions is "knowledge" properly so-called is an interesting question, but one well beyond the scope of these comments and unnecessary for their rational evaluation.
America's Blind SpotCanadian Drug Warrior, I said Get AwayCommon Sense Drug WithdrawalDrug War MurderersDrugs are not the problemEnd the Drug War NowFeedback on my first legal psilocybin session in OregonFinally, a Drug War opponent who checks all my boxesFreedom of Religion and the War on DrugsGetting off antidepressants in the age of the Drug WarGod and DrugsHello? MDMA works, already!How Addiction Scientists Reckon without the Drug WarHow National Geographic slanders the Inca people and their use of cocaHow Scientific American reckons without the Drug WarHow the Drug War is Threatening Intellectual Freedom in EnglandHow the Drug War Outlaws Criticism of Immanuel KantHow the Monticello Foundation betrayed Jefferson's Legacy in 1987How the US Preventive Services Task Force Drums Up Business for Big PharmaI'll See Your Antidepressants and Raise You One Huachuma CactusIgnorance is the enemy, not FentanylIllusions with Professor Arthur ShapiroIn Defense of Religious Drug UseKeep Laughing Gas LegalMDMA for PsychotherapyMy Realistic Plan for Getting off of Big Pharma Drugs and why it's so hard to implementNo drugs are bad in and of themselvesOpen Letter to Addiction Specialist Gabor MateOpen Letter to Anthony GottliebOpen Letter to Congressman Ben Cline, asking him to abolish the criminal DEAOpen Letter to Diane O'LearyOpen Letter to Erica ZelfandOpen Letter to Francis FukuyamaOpen letter to Kenneth SewellOpen Letter to Lisa LingOpen letter to Professor Troy Glover at Waterloo UniversityOpen Letter to Richard HammersleyOpen Letter to Rick Doblin and Roland GriffithsOpen Letter to Roy Benaroch MDOpen Letter to the United Nations Office on Drugs and CrimeOpen Letter to the Virginia LegislatureOpen Letter to Variety Critic Owen GliebermanOpen Letter to Vincent Hurley, LecturerOpen Letter to Vincent RadoOpen letter to Wolfgang SmithPredictive Policing in the Age of the Drug WarProhibitionists Never LearnRegulate and EducateReplacing antidepressants with entheogensReview of When Plants DreamScience News Continues to Ignore the Drug WarScience News magazine continues to pretend that there is no War on DrugsSolquinox sounded great, until I found out I wasn't invitedSpeaking Truth to Big PharmaTeenagers and CannabisThe common sense way to get off of antidepressantsThe Criminalization of Nitrous Oxide is No Laughing MatterThe Depressing Truth About SSRIsThe Invisible Mass ShootingsThe Menace of the Drug WarThe problem with Modern Drug Reform EffortsThe Pseudoscience of Mental Health TreatmentThere is nothing to debate: the Drug War is wrong, root and branchTime for News Outlets to stop promoting Drug War liesTop 10 Problems with the Drug WarUnscientific AmericanUsing plants and fungi to get off of antidepressantsVancouver Police Seek to Eradicate Safe UseWeed Bashing at WTOP.COMWhitehead and PsychedelicsWhy DARE should stop telling kids to say noWhy Rick Doblin is Ghosting MeWhy the Drug War is Worse than you can ImagineWhy the FDA is not qualified to judge psychoactive medicineEgo Transcendence Made EasyHow the Drug War limits our understanding of Immanuel KantHow the Drug War Outlaws Criticism of Immanuel KantImmanuel Kant on DrugsPsilocybin BreakthroughSchopenhauer and DrugsToo Honest to Be Popular?What Can the Chemical Hold?What's Drugs Got to Do With It?