In "The Varieties of Religious Experience," William James demonstrated how materialists are blind to the depth and meaning of psychological states of ecstasy and transcendence -- or in other words the states that are peculiar to mystics like St. Teresa... and to those who use psychoactive substances like laughing gas. The medical materialist is dogmatically dismissive of such states, which explains why they can pretend that godsend medicines that elate and inspire have no positive uses whatsoever:
"To the medical mind these ecstasies signify nothing but suggested and imitated hypnoid states, on an intellectual basis of superstition, and a corporeal one of degeneration and hysteria. Undoubtedly these pathological conditions have existed in many and possibly in all the cases, but that fact tells us nothing about the value for knowledge of the consciousness which they induce."
And so materialist scientists collaborate with the drug war by refusing to see glaringly obvious drug benefits. They acknowledge only those benefits that they believe are visible under a microscope. The Hindu religion would not exist today had materialist scientists held soma to such a standard. But that's the absurd pass to which prohibition eventually brings us in a society wherein materialist science is the new god: scientists are put in charge of deciding whether we are allowed to imagine new religions or not.
This materialist bias is inspired in turn by behaviorism, the anti-indigenous doctrine of JB Watson that makes the following inhumane claim:
"Concepts such as belief and desire are heritages of a timid savage past akin to concepts referring to magic."
According to this view, the hopes and the dreams of a "patient" are to be ignored. Instead, we are to chart their physiology and brain chemistry.
JB Watson's Behaviorism is a sort of Dr. Spock with a vengeance. It is the perfect ideology for a curmudgeon, because it would seem to justify all their inability to deal with human emotions. Unfortunately, the attitude has knock-on effects because it teaches drug researchers to ignore common sense and to downplay or ignore all positive usage reports or historic lessons about positive drug use. The "patient" needs to just shut up and let the doctors decide how they are doing. It is a doctrine that dovetails nicely with drug war ideology, because it empowers the researcher to ignore the obvious: that all drugs that elate have potential uses as antidepressants.
That statement can only be denied when one assumes that "real" proof of efficacy of a psychoactive medicine must be determined by a doctor, and that the patient's only job is to shut up because their hopes and dreams and feelings cannot be accurately displayed and quantified on a graph or a bar chart.
Addicted to AddictionAddictionAfter the Drug WarAfter the Drug War part 2Another Cry in the WildernessAssisted Suicide and the War on DrugsBeta Blockers and the Materialist Tyranny of the War on DrugsBrahms is NOT the best antidepressantCase Studies in Wise Drug UseCommon Sense Drug WithdrawalDeclaration of Independence from the War on DrugsDrug Use as Self-MedicationDrugs are not the enemy, hatred is the enemyEgo Transcendence Made EasyElderly Victims of Drug War IdeologyGetting off antidepressants in the age of the drug warGoodbye Patient, Hello ClientHarold & Kumar Support the Drug WarHeroin versus AlcoholHow Cocaine could have helped meHow drug prohibition destroys the lives of the depressedHow Drug Prohibition Leads to Excessive Drinking and SmokingHow Psychiatry and the Drug War turned me into an eternal patientHow the Drug War Blinds us to Godsend MedicineHow the Drug War is a War on CreativityHow the Drug War Killed Amy WinehouseHow The Drug War Killed Andy GibbHow the Drug War Punishes the ElderlyHow the Myth of Mental Illness supports the war on drugsHow to Unite Drug War Opponents of all EthnicitiesHypocritical America Embraces Drug War FascismIn Praise of Doctor FeelgoodIn Praise of Drug DealersIn Praise of Thomas SzaszLet's Hear It For Psychoactive TherapyMedications for so-called 'opioid-use disorder' are legionNotes about the Madness of Drug ProhibitionOpen Letter to Dr. Carl L. HartOpen Letter to ErowidOpen Letter to Gabrielle GlaserOpen Letter to Lisa LingPihkal 2.0Replacing 12-Step Programs with Shamanic HealingReplacing Psychiatry with Pharmacologically Savvy ShamanismScience is not free in the age of the drug warShannon Information and Magic MushroomsSomeone you love is suffering unnecessarily because of the war on drugsThank God for ErowidThank God for Soul QuestTHE ANTI DRUG WAR BLOGThe Drug War and ArmageddonThe Great Philosophical Problem of Our TimeThe Mother of all Western BiasesThe Muddled Metaphysics of the Drug WarThe Myth of the Addictive PersonalityThe New Age of Pharmacological SerfdomThe Origins of Modern PsychiatryThe Philosophical Idiocy of the Drug WarThe real reason for depression in AmericaUsing Opium to Fight DepressionWhat Jim Hogshire Got Wrong about DrugsWhy America's Mental Healthcare System is InsaneWhy Americans Prefer Suicide to Drug UseWhy Louis Theroux is Clueless about Addiction and AlcoholismWhy Scientists Should Not Judge DrugsA Quantum of HubrisAssisted Suicide and the War on DrugsBehaviorism and the War on DrugsBeta Blockers and the Materialist Tyranny of the War on DrugsDavid Chalmers and the Drug WarEvery Day and in every way, you are getting more and more bamboozled by drug war propaganda Five problems with The Psychedelic Handbook by Rick StrassmanHow Bernardo Kastrup reckons without the drug warI've got a bone to pick with Jim HogshireIn Praise of Thomas SzaszMaterialism and the Drug War Part IIOpen Letter to Dr. Carl L. HartOpen letter to Wolfgang SmithUnscientific American: the hypocritical materialism of Elon MuskWhy Scientists Should Not Judge DrugsWilliam James rolls over in his grave as England bans Laughing GasWithout Philosophy, Science becomes Scientism
Every time I see a psychiatrist, I feel like I'm playing a game of make-believe. We're both pretending that hundreds of demonized medicines do not exist and could be of no use whatsoever.
