bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter


Sartre and Speed

a review of essay number 4 in Hallucinogens: A Reader, edited by Charles Grob

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher





June 26, 2025



The following remarks are part of a series of responses to the essays contained in the 2001 book "Hallucinogens: A Reader," edited by Charles Grob1. The comments below are in response to essay number 4: "Two Classic Trips: Jean-Paul Sartre and Adelle Davis" by Thomas Riedlinger


Riedlinger relates how Sartre "gobbled" massive quantities of amphetamines in order to write "at least three times my normal rhythm." This is the kind of enormous and obvious drug benefit that no one dares acknowledge in the age of drug prohibition. We do not hear about this ability of "speed" to improve mentation because drug law frightens all of those who use drugs in this way into complete silence about their use of this biochemical hack. As a result, we only hear about "speed" in connection with law enforcement and arrests and "meth labs." This is how the Drug Warrior keeps otherwise smart people like Ralph Metzner in a perpetual tizzy about drugs -- or at least about non-psychedelic drugs. They do this by shutting down all positive talk of drug use -- and the Metzners of the world then mistake the resulting silence on the topic as a sign that no positive uses exist for demonized medicines. The fact is, however, that most people actually use drugs wisely, as Carl Hart explains in Drug Use for Grown-Ups. It is just that members of this silent majority have no incentive to talk honestly about their drug use -- and plenty of reasons not to. The Drug War is all about the strategic branding of drug use as good or bad. Speed is good when we call it Ritalin and use it to increase the concentration level of grade schoolers. Speed is evil when we call it meth and use it to increase the concentration level of adults.

Unfortunately, it would seem that you can fool all of the people all of the time with Drug War propaganda -- or at least all of the non-indigenous peoples -- considering how many Drug War pundits are themselves bamboozled by various Drug War lies.



Notes:

1: Hallucinogens: a reader Grob, M.D., editor, Charles, Penguin Putnam, 2002 (up)


Hallucinogens: a Reader, edited by Charles Grob




Essays about the opinions expressed in Hallucinogens by Charles Grob.

  • Cocaine and Ecstasy are not evil
  • Drug Prohibition and the Metaphysical Search for 'Real' Religious Inspiration
  • How Ralph Metzner was bamboozled by the Drug War ideology of substance demonization
  • Sartre and Speed
  • The Drug War is One Big Branding Operation to Demonize Mind and Mood Medicine
  • The metaphysics of drug use and how the drug war outlaws religious liberty
  • The thin line between honesty and fearmongering in the age of the War on Drugs
  • Want to end freedom in America? Just terrify philosophically clueless parents about the boogieman called drugs
  • Why America cracked down on LSD





  • Ten Tweets

    against the hateful war on US




    Anytime you hear that a psychoactive drug has not been proven to be effective, it's a lie. People can make such claims only by dogmatically ignoring all the glaringly obvious signs of efficacy.

    First we outlaw all drugs that could help; then we complain that some people have 'TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION'. What? No. What they really "have" is an inability to thrive because of our idiotic drug laws. 3:51 PM ยท Jul 15, 2024

    When it comes to "drugs," the government plays Polonius to our Ophelia: OPHELIA: I do not know, my lord, what I should think. POLONIUS: Marry, I'll teach you; think yourself a baby!

    The Hindu religion was inspired by drug use.

    The Drug War is the ultimate example of strategic fearmongering by self-interested politicians.

    When Americans "obtain their majority" and wish to partake of drugs safely, they should be paired with older adults who have done just that. Instead, we introduce them to "drug abusers" in prerecorded morality plays to reinforce our biased notions that drug use is wrong.

    Almost every mainstream article about psychology and consciousness is nonsense these days because it ignores the way that drug prohibition has stymied our investigation of such subjects.

    The FDA tells us that MDMA is not safe. This is the same FDA that tells us that "shock therapy" is safe.

    Question: What's the difference between Big Pharma antidepressants and other drugs? Answer: For other drugs, dependency is a bug; for antidepressants, dependency is a feature.

    MDMA legalization has suffered a setback by the FDA. These are the people who think Electro Shock Therapy is not used often enough! What sick priorities.


    Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






    Drug Prohibition and the Metaphysical Search for 'Real' Religious Inspiration
    Cocaine and Ecstasy are not evil


    This site uses no cookies! This site features no ads!



    Thanks for visiting The Drug War Philosopher at abolishthedea.com, featuring essays against America's disgraceful drug war. Updated daily.

    Copyright 2025, Brian Ballard Quass Contact: quass@quass.com


    (up)