bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter


Sartre and Speed

a review of essay number 4 in Hallucinogens: A Reader, edited by Charles Grob

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher





June 26, 2025



The following remarks are part of a series of responses to the essays contained in the 2001 book "Hallucinogens: A Reader," edited by Charles Grob1. The comments below are in response to essay number 4: "Two Classic Trips: Jean-Paul Sartre and Adelle Davis" by Thomas Riedlinger


Riedlinger relates how Sartre "gobbled" massive quantities of amphetamines in order to write "at least three times my normal rhythm." This is the kind of enormous and obvious drug benefit that no one dares acknowledge in the age of drug prohibition. We do not hear about this ability of "speed" to improve mentation because drug law frightens all of those who use drugs in this way into complete silence about their use of this biochemical hack. As a result, we only hear about "speed" in connection with law enforcement and arrests and "meth labs." This is how the Drug Warrior keeps otherwise smart people like Ralph Metzner in a perpetual tizzy about drugs -- or at least about non-psychedelic drugs. They do this by shutting down all positive talk of drug use -- and the Metzners of the world then mistake the resulting silence on the topic as a sign that no positive uses exist for demonized medicines. The fact is, however, that most people actually use drugs wisely, as Carl Hart explains in Drug Use for Grown-Ups. It is just that members of this silent majority have no incentive to talk honestly about their drug use -- and plenty of reasons not to. The Drug War is all about the strategic branding of drug use as good or bad. Speed is good when we call it Ritalin and use it to increase the concentration level of grade schoolers. Speed is evil when we call it meth and use it to increase the concentration level of adults.

Unfortunately, it would seem that you can fool all of the people all of the time with Drug War propaganda -- or at least all of the non-indigenous peoples -- considering how many Drug War pundits are themselves bamboozled by various Drug War lies.

Hallucinogens: a Reader, edited by Charles Grob




Essays about the opinions expressed in Hallucinogens by Charles Grob.

  • Cocaine and Ecstasy are not evil
  • Drug Prohibition and the Metaphysical Search for 'Real' Religious Inspiration
  • How Ralph Metzner was bamboozled by the Drug War ideology of substance demonization
  • Sartre and Speed
  • The Drug War is One Big Branding Operation to Demonize Mind and Mood Medicine
  • The metaphysics of drug use and how the Drug War outlaws religious liberty
  • The thin line between honesty and fearmongering in the age of the War on Drugs
  • Want to end freedom in America? Just terrify philosophically clueless parents about the boogieman called drugs
  • Why America cracked down on LSD


  • Notes:

    1: Hallucinogens: a reader (up)







    Ten Tweets

    against the hateful war on US




    Psychiatrists never acknowledge the biggest downside to modern antidepressants: the fact that they turn you into a patient for life. That's demoralizing, especially since the best drugs for depression are outlawed by the government.

    Most people think that drugs like cocaine, MDMA, LSD and amphetamines can only be used recreationally. WRONG ! This represents a very naive understanding of human psychology. We deny common sense in order to cater to the drug war orthodoxy that "drugs have no benefits."

    The Drug War is based on a huge number of misconceptions and prejudices. Obviously it's about power and racism too. It's all of the above. But every time I don't mention one specifically, someone makes out that I'm a moron. Gotta love Twitter.

    Richard Evans Schultes seems to have originated the harebrained idea (since used by the US Supreme Court to suppress new religions) that you have no right to use drugs in a religious ritual if you did not grow up in a society that had such practices. What tyrannical idiocy!

    SSRIs are created based on the materialist notion that cures should be found under a microscope. That's why science is so slow in acknowledging the benefit of plant medicines. Anyone who chooses SSRIs over drugs like San Pedro cactus is simply uninformed.

    The U.S. government created violence out of whole cloth in America's inner cities with drug prohibition -- and now it is using that violence as an excuse to kick the people that they themselves have knocked down.

    Materialist puritans do not want to create any drug that elates. So they go on a fool's errand to find reductionist cures for "depression itself," as if the vast array of human sadness could (or should) be treated with a one-size-fits-all readjustment of brain chemicals.

    If I beat my depression by smoking opium nightly, I am a drug scumbag subject to immediate arrest. But if I do NOT "take my meds" every day of my life, I am a bad patient.

    Amphetamines are "meds" when they help kids think more clearly but they are "drugs" when they help adults think more clearly. That shows you just how bewildered Americans are when it comes to drugs.

    Why does no one talk about empathogens for preventing atrocities? Because they'd rather hate drugs than use them for the benefit of humanity. They don't want to solve problems, they prefer hatred.


    Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






    Drug Prohibition and the Metaphysical Search for 'Real' Religious Inspiration
    Cocaine and Ecstasy are not evil


    Copyright 2025 abolishthedea.com, Brian Quass

    (up)