The following screed was rapped out in double-time by a dude who by rights should be working on his freelance assignment right now (the nature of which work, however, shall remain a secret here in deference to the time sensitivities of the no-doubt harried reader). Brian couldn't stop himself, so pissed was he with the ongoing attempt by the US government to blame every imaginable earthly ill on the politically created boogieman called "drugs." These comments, by the way, were sent directly to the esteemed representatives via their websites, despite the nagging suspicion by the author that the duo in question have been hopelessly brainwashed by the Christian Science ideology of the war on Americans, AKA the War on Drugs.
By the way, the efficient causes of this harangue (if one might wax philosophical for just a moment) were the superstitious tweets of one Alex Berenson which Brian, alas, read this morning, in which the prohibitionist author tweaked reformers for the problems that he blamed on marijuana legalization 1 . As usual, all the problems that he cited (to the extent that they were not just the figments of a nature-fearing imagination) were actually the result of the ongoing prohibition of all of marijuana's competitors. With this niggling impetus then -- and with the anxious knowledge of tomorrow's US Senate vote on the troglodytic HALT Act -- Brian could do nought else but expostulate, even if it meant that the poor guy would be up past midnight tonight catching up on that undefined freelancing work of his that I alluded to above.
Dear Senators
Prohibition has been the biggest mistake in American history. It is wrong root and branch. Our attitude towards "drugs" is prehistoric and anti-scientific. We come at the issue from the wrong direction. We should be awestruck at Nature's healing power (which God said was good) and be seeking all sorts of ways to use it safely and wisely. Instead, we believe that all psychoactive substances are bad -- without even asking for proof.
It is a self-fulfilling prophecy, which leads to folks seeking transcendence from a corrupted drug supply furnished by dealers interested in the bottom line.
Please end this folly. We need an amendment that prohibits prohibition -- which causes death and sorrow and denies godsend medicines to the distressed. Even now, in America's hysterical attempt to blame opioids for every evil under the sun, we are denying godsend pain medicine to kids in hospice --based on our superstitious belief in the evil of opiates. Opium was considered a godsend by Avicenna, Galen and Paracelsus. It is not evil. Bad social policies are evil.
FREE SCIENCE. Stop the NIDA campaign to make us think that drugs can only be used for evil. It is propaganda, not science, because they completely ignore the reason people use "drugs": in order to transcend self and improve their lives. That is the truth. NIDA 2 is all about ignoring that fact.
The Drug War has led to the election of Drug Warriors like Trump by jailing hundreds of thousands of blacks. If unchecked, the Drug War will completely destroy America. It is not wrong in parts -- it is wrong ROOT AND BRANCH. It is a WRONG WAY OF LOOKING AT THE WORLD!!!!!!!!!!!!
No wonder it leads to chaos, inner-city deaths, and the end of the rule of law in Latin America!!!!
Please vote NO ON HALT
May 24, 2023
"The biggest mistake in American history." Well, slavery was worse. (Remember, the old boy wrote this in a hurry.) That said, however, the Drug War can be seen as the extension of slavery by other means, as the book Whiteout makes abundantly clear.
Author's Follow-up: January 9, 2025
Protesting the Drug War is frustrating for anyone who has seen through the racist and anti-democratic project. It is as if one lives in a world wherein logic applies except in the case of cats, a world in which everyone is convinced that cats are demons. Where does one begin in changing minds? You can't just say that, "No, cats are NOT demons." That's not going to convince any true believer in the reigning superstition. So you're forced to backtrack to Philosophy 101 and broach topics like, what makes a cat a cat and what makes a demon a demon and start creating logically undeniable syllogisms to distinguish the two.
Also, here's another "biggest mistake" in American history: our decision to go ahead with the development of thermonuclear weapons in the 1950s, rather than seeking to outlaw them entirely and launching a multi-billion-dollar campaign to increase compassion worldwide with the strategic use of entheogens. But that solution, unfortunately, is just common sense, and common sense is at a premium in the superstitious age of the Drug War. Just ask the materialists who cannot figure out if laughing gas could help the depressed3.
For anyone who doubts the enormity of this mistake regarding nukes, I suggest a little bedtime reading in the form of "nuclear war 456 : A Scenario" by Annie Jacobsen7.
What we've really got to outlaw, of course, are horses! When Christopher Reeves was disabled by one of those dangerous equines, we should have been asking: who was peddling that junk? From whom had Christopher bought that horse?! He should have been given 20 years at minimum for dealing in death!
See? I can become just as indignant as any Drug Warrior. Humph! Of course, I am a moderate. I do not believe with our Horse Czar that horse dealers should be beheaded -- that is going a bit too far, perhaps -- but they should certainly do some serious time! Humph!
Oh, it feels so good to be morally indignant. But we should not let Drug Warriors have all the fun. Let's get indignant about all people who deal in death: those who sell alcohol, for instance, and skateboards! Humph! Oh, the ecstasies of a just indignation!
You too can ride the prohibitionist's indignation bandwagon. Find out how here: .
Support the goal of the Partnership for a Death Free America. We are aiming for a Death-Free country by the year 2030! We need YOUR indignation to reach our goal! Tell Congress that you're not going to tolerate this anymore! End the madness! Outlaw all the many unregulated threats that could kill any one of our innocent little white children even as we speak! I say again, humph!
Author's Follow-up:
I need scarcely add that the HALT act was passed. The troglodytes in Congress still believe that health issues in America should be handled by the police. What a fascist idea! Until I studied the Drug War, I had my own reservations about national healthcare. Then I found that the harshest opponents of that measure were all in favor of spending trillions on health -- it's just that they wanted the money to go to the military and police forces. We could spend a fraction of that money on establishing a system of pharmacologically savvy empaths around the country who could advise on the safest and wisest uses for psychoactive medicine -- in a world in which all substances were legal once again and in which we frowned only on uneducated drug use -- not on drug use in general. After all, drug use created the Hindu religion. It was created thanks to the inspiration and elation provided by the psychoactive drug (or drugs) known as Soma. It follows from this statement that it is the violation of religious liberty to outlaw substances that inspire and elate.
There are definitely good scientists out there. Unfortunately, they are either limited by their materialist orthodoxy into showing only specific microscopic evidence or they abandon materialism for the nonce and talk the common psychological sense that we all understand.
Drug testing labs should give high marks for those who manage to use drugs responsibly, notwithstanding the efforts of law enforcement to ruin their lives. The lab guy would be like: "Wow, you are using opium wisely, my friend! Congratulations! Your boss is lucky to have you!"
Two weeks ago, a guy told me that most psychiatrists believe ECT is great. I thought he was joking! I've since come to realize that he was telling the truth: that is just how screwed up the healthcare system is today thanks to drug war ideology and purblind materialism.
The FDA will be accepting comments through September 20th on the subject of ways to fight PTSD.
PTSD@reaganudall.org
Ask them why they support brain-damaging shock therapy but won't approve drugs like MDMA that could make ECT unnecessary.
The DEA is gaslighting Americans, telling them that drugs with obvious benefits have no benefits whatsoever. Scientists collude in this lie thanks to their adherence to the emotion-scorning principles of behaviorism.
"Judging" psychoactive drugs is hard. Dosage counts. Expectations count. Setting counts. In Harvey Rosenfeld's book about the Spanish-American War, a volunteer wrote of his visit to an "opium den": "I took about four puffs and that was enough. All of us were sick for a week."
If they're going to throw doctors in jail for prescribing too much pain medication, they should also throw them in jail for prescribing too LITTLE.
We need to start thinking of drug-related deaths like we do about car accidents: They're terrible, and yet they should move us to make driving safer, not to outlaw driving. To think otherwise is to swallow the drug war lie that "drugs" can have no positive uses.
Every time I see a psychiatrist, I feel like I'm playing a game of make-believe. We're both pretending that hundreds of demonized medicines do not exist and could be of no use whatsoever.
Don't the Oregon prohibitionists realize that all the thousands of deaths from opiates is so much blood on their hands?
(up)