How drug prohibition turns Americans into children when it comes to healthcare
by Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher
September 10, 2025
Drug policy has turned Americans into children. It deprives them of their time-honored right to take care of their own health. And this infantilization affects users of all controlled substances, not just illegal ones.
Take me, for instance. I am a 67-year-old who has been on the Big Pharma antidepressant called Effexor 1 for decades, and yet I am still required to visit the doctor every three months of my life in order to get refills. I am not even trusted to buy the drug without medical oversight. It is bad enough that drug prohibitionists gave Big Pharma 23 a monopoly on mind and mood medicine, thereby turning me into a patient for life with their dependence-causing "meds" -- but it adds insult to injury when they force me to visit a doctor every three months of my life to get a renewed prescription. They thereby constantly remind me that I am an eternal patient and a ward of the healthcare state. It is complete disempowerment, and yet like so many problems with modern drug policy, I seem to be the only person who is complaining about it.
This is a philosophical conundrum. How is it that Americans tolerate such enormous disempowerment when it comes to healthcare? Americans demand empowerment in all other areas of life: why not when it comes to their healthcare4?
The answer, I contend, is that they have a naive belief that they are receiving science-based healthcare and that their job is therefore simply to obey the doctors. They believe that science has developed proven cures for depression and that it is therefore Ludditism to complain about the status quo.
These contented masses seem to be unaware of the fact that there are plenty of medicines out there that could end depression in a trice -- and without causing a lifelong dependency. The wise intermittent use of a variety of drugs is all that an adult would need to take care of their own psychological health. But then that is the medical establishment's worst nightmare: a world in which human beings are allowed to take care of their own health. And so we are taught that we are children when it comes to psychoactive medicine. We are taught that we can never learn to use drugs wisely and that "doctor knows best" when it comes to mind and mood medicine. Thanks to this patronizing control of psychoactive substances, the medical establishment profits enormously from the disempowerment of Americans with respect to healthcare.
As Thomas Szasz writes:
Because these latter controls are ostensibly based on Science and aim to secure only Health, and because those who are so coerced and colonized often worship the idols of medical and therapeutic scientism as ardently as do the coercers and colonizers, the victims cannot even articulate their predicament and are therefore quite powerless to resist their victimizers.5
It's always wrong to demonize drugs in the abstract. That's anti-scientific. It begs so many questions and leaves suffering pain patients (and others) high and dry. No substance is bad in and of itself.
Big Pharma drugs have wrought disaster when used in psychotherapy, but it does not follow that the depressed should become Christian Scientists. The use of outlawed drugs can obviate the need for shock therapy.
Magazines like Psychology Today continue to publish feel-good articles about depression which completely ignore the fact that we have outlawed all drugs that could end depression in a heartbeat.
We're living in a sci-fi dystopia called "Fahrenheit 452", in which the police burn thought-expanding plants instead of thought-expanding books.
The Hindu religion was created thanks to the use of a drug that inspired and elated. It is therefore a crime against religious liberty to outlaw substances that inspire and elate.
Typical materialist protocol. Take all the "wonder" out of the drug and sell it as a one-size-fits all "reductionist" cure for anxiety. Notice that they refer to hallucinations and euphoria as "adverse effects." What next? Communion wine with the religion taken out of it?
Many psychonauts (like Terence McKenna) praise psychedelics while demonizing other psychoactive substances. No substance is bad in itself. All substances have some use at some dose for some reason for some people in some circumstance.
Q: Where can you find almost-verbatim copies of the descriptions of religious experiences described by William James? A: In descriptions of user reports of "trips" on drugs ranging from coca to opium, from MDMA to laughing gas.
Most psychoactive substance use can be judged as recreational OR medicinal OR both. The judgements are not just determined by the circumstances of use, either, but also by the biases of those doing the judging.
The drug war is a way for conservatives to keep America's eyes OFF the prize. The right-wing motto is, "Billions for law enforcement, but not one cent for social programs."
(up)