an open letter to posterity from the only philosopher in the world who is pointing out the full evil of drug prohibition despite being completely ignored by the mainstream
by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher
March 20, 2026
I do so hate to brag, but there is at point which humility becomes a kind of dishonesty. Know, therefore, that I am the only one in the world who has pointed out that assisted suicide cannot be discussed advisedly without discussing the drug prohibition that renders it necessary. There, I've said it. What's more, drug prohibition denies us the kinds of drugs that might make us want to live. Drug use inspired the Vedic religion and use of the coca leaf was -- and continues to be -- an inspiration to the Inca and their descendants. What does it say about America when I am the only one who connects these facts? And I have not sat on this stuff. I have spread the news to the movers and shakers in the assisted suicide game and no one even acknowledges my letters.
I do not say that all pain patients could necessarily be helped in this way -- but I am saying that it is evil not even to try to help them in this way, just as it would be evil to withhold medicines for "physical" purposes.
One of the main problems is that that we have placed doctors in charge of mind and mood medicine. And so the conversation on this topic is going on behind academic paywalls in the form of heavily annotated papers from folks without any skin in the game and who completely ignore the power of drugs to inspire and elate. I am not invited to the party where my fate is decided by our highly paid professionals who are dogma-bound to ignore common sense when it comes to drugs, like the obvious fact that laughing gas cheers one up and the once-obvious fact that it is better to use drugs than to die! Imagine that.
But then I am also the only one in the world who has pointed out that outlawing laughing gas is the outlawing of academic freedom. It truly seems like drug-bashing and drug-scapegoating is built into America's DNA. The irony is that so many Americans pride themselves on recognizing and denouncing colonialism when they see it, and yet by promoting drug prohibition, they are promoting pharmacological colonialism around the world, ending the time-honored use of substances that for more intelligent cultures were used wisely.
Iranians were peaceably smoking opium until the Shah of Iran outlawed the drug at the behest of America -- the same America that is now worried that Iranians are hotheads?
I write this short essay just to remind posterity: I want credit where credit's due -- assuming that the western world ever comes to its senses -- or better yet to the senses of holistic-thinking indigenous peoples -- when it comes to drugs.
PS If I'm wrong, let me know. But I have yet to hear of any philosopher but myself (or academic, for that matter) who is complaining to the FDA about their plans to outlaw laughing gas, complaining on behalf of academic freedom and the legacy of William James. In fact, the online biography for James at his alma mater of Harvard University does not even mention James' use of laughing gas, which changed his whole ideas about consciousness and the nature of reality! Likewise, I have heard of no one else pointing out the glaringly obvious fact that assisted suicide cannot be advisedly discussed without discussing the drug prohibition which keeps folks from adopting positive attitudes and hence potentially deciding to live instead of die! Let me know who's out there that is speaking up on these topics. I'd love to chat with them! I know there are plenty of enemies of drug prohibition in general, but I have yet to hear these rather obvious points being made by any of them. The laurels seem to be mine for now. And just imagine how brainwashed the world has become to make a relative dimwit like myself the leader in this field. Wow! It's flattering in a way. Thanks for hanging back, everybody, and letting an unknown contender take the lead.
Now I'll just wait for posterity to sing my praises -- assuming of course that sanity one day prevails.
Key Takeaways:
Assisted suicide cannot be discussed advisedly without discussing drug prohibition.
Drug use inspired the Vedic religion.
No one in the assisted suicide debate acknowledges the existence of outlawed substances that inspire and elate.
Hollywood presents cocaine as a drug of killers. In reality, strategic cocaine use by an educated person can lead to great mental power, especially as just one part of a pharmacologically balanced diet.
People are talking about re-scheduling psilocybin, but they miss the point. We need to DE-schedule everything. It's anti-scientific to conclude in advance that any drug has no uses -- and it's a lie too, of course. End drug scheduling altogether! It's childish and wrong.
Like when Laura Sanders tells us in Science News that depression is an intractable problem, she should rather tell us: "Depression is an intractable problem... that is, in a world wherein we refuse to consider the benefits of 'drugs,' let alone to fight for their beneficial use."
Many people take antidepressants believing their depression has a biochemical cause. Research does not support this belief. --Dr. Noam Shpancer, Psychology Today
And where did politicians get the idea that irresponsible white American young people are the only stakeholders when it comes to the question of re-legalizing drugs??? There are hundreds of millions of other stakeholders: philosophers, pain patients, the depressed.
AI is like almost every subject under the sun: it takes on a very different and ominous meaning when we view it in light of the modern world's unprecedented wholesale outlawing of psychoactive medicine.
Psychedelics and entheogens should be freely available to all dementia patients. These medicines can increase neuronal plasticity and even grow new neurons. Besides, they can inspire and elate -- or do we puritans feel that our loved ones have no right to peace of mind?
Being a lifetime patient is not the issue: that could make perfect sense in certain cases. But if I am to be "using" for life, I demand the drug of MY CHOICE, not that of Big Pharma and mainstream psychiatry, who are dogmatically deaf to the benefits of hated substances.
There are times when it is clearly WRONG to deny kids drugs (whatever the law may say). If your child is obsessed with school massacres, he or she is an excellent candidate for using empathogenic meds ASAP -- or do we prefer even school shootings to drug use???
In "The Book of the Damned," Charles Fort writes about the data that science has damned, by which he means "excluded." The fact that drugs can inspire and elate is one such fact, although when Fort wrote his anti-materialist broadside, drug prohibition was in its infancy.
Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.
I do so hate to brag, but there is at point which humility becomes a kind of dishonesty. Know, therefore, that I am the only one in the world who has pointed out that assisted suicide cannot be discussed advisedly without discussing the drug prohibition that renders it necessary. There, I've said it. What's more, drug prohibition denies us the kinds of drugs that might make us want to live. Drug use inspired the Vedic religion and use of the coca leaf was -- and continues to be -- an inspiration to the Inca and their descendants. What does it say about America when I am the only one who connects these facts? And I have not sat on this stuff. I have spread the news to the movers and shakers in the assisted suicide game and no one even acknowledges my letters. 
(up)