Homepage of the Drug War Philosopher, Brian Quass
blog icon orange rss icon with stylized radio waves bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter substack icon


back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow


Medications for so-called 'opioid-use disorder' are legion

it's just that we have outlawed them all

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher

April 24, 2025



The following is an open letter to Dr. Nabarun Dasgupta, senior scientist at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill.1

Dear Dr. Dasgupta,

I have just received your email from the DPA2 containing the subject line "I've Studied Overdose Deaths for 20 Years."

Discussion Questions

As someone who has written hundreds of philosophical essays about the Drug War, I would like to offer a comment or two on that email, specifically the link that reads

"What are medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD)? What are barriers to people getting them?"


I would like to suggest to you that medications for getting off of opioids are legion -- but that they are almost all outlawed. Mainstream medicine is blind to this fact because of the behaviorist-materialist approach to mind and mood medicine, which looks for answers to emotional problems under a microscope rather than recognizing psychological common sense. According to this philosophy, laughter and happiness do not count: only quantifiable data -- and so even if a person withdrawing from a drug is laughing their heart out, the materialist will tell him or her a la Dr. Spock of Star Trek that they are not "really" treating their addiction. But this is just a metaphysical claim, presupposing the correctness of the non-holistic western approach to medicine.

Take me, for instance. I have had enormous trouble getting off of Effexor3, which my psychiatrist told me has a 95% recidivism rate for long-term users who attempt to stop the drug 4, worse than heroin 5 according to psychiatrist Julie Holland6. And yet what is recidivism but the result of a few hours of high-anxiety existential angst, often experienced in the wee hours of the morning? And those few hours could clearly be "gotten through" with the help of drugs that inspire and elate -- as, for instance, the use of the phenethylamines synthesized by chemist Alexander Shulgin7, or even the as-needed use of opium and coca or laughing gas . That latter substance inspires ecstasies and heavenly visions, as reported by William James, who conjured philosophers to use the substance to investigate the nature of perception and reality8. It is just psychological common sense that as-needed use of such substances could help one refrain from back-sliding in their attempt to get off an unwanted substance. They do not need materialist drugs that are custom-made for that purpose based on the reification of an opiate-related problem as a discrete "illness."

It is absolutely clear to me that I could get through the downsides of withdrawal -- easily -- with the strategic as-needed help of such substances as laughing gas and phenethylamines.

Consider these phenethylamine user reports from Pihkal9:


"I experienced the desire to laugh hysterically at what I could only describe as the completely ridiculous state of the entire world."

"Excellent feelings, tremendous opening of insight and understanding, a real awakening."

"I acknowledged a rapture in the very act of breathing."

Surely, materialists are gaslighting 10 us11 when they say that such medicines are of no use in fighting unwanted opioid dependence. And they are doing so, in my view, because they have "reified" opioid problems as a sort of "thing apart" in the disease-mongering DSM, as a discrete monolithic biochemical pathology that has nothing to do with everyday human life -- as if those attempting to withdraw from the drug were aliens from Mars and not amenable to the common-sense psychological incentives of "normal" human beings.

To answer your questions then:


Question: What are medications for opioid use disorder?
Answer: Almost all the psychoactive medicines that America has outlawed.
Question: What are the barriers to people getting them?
Answer: Drug prohibition.


Drug prohibition, which is based on the following anti-scientific idea:

that a substance that could cause problems for white young people when used at one dose for one reason, must not be used by anybody at any dose for any reason.

prohibition is the problem 12 , not drugs, but America will not see this fact as long as materialists connive in the Drug War lie that inspirational medicines have no positive uses, even when anecdote, history and common sense say otherwise.


Sincerely Yours


PS I feel strongly about this topic because Drug War ideology and materialist orthodoxy has deprived me for a lifetime now of godsend medicines that have glaringly obvious abilities to inspire and elate. Indeed, the Hindu religion itself was inspired by a drug that inspired and elated13 -- from which one fact alone it follows the drug prohibition is the outlawing of the religious impulse, to say nothing of our right to take care of our own psychological health as we see fit, without seeking help from a materialist medical establishment that profits from our distress.



Author's Follow-up:

April 24, 2025

picture of clock metaphorically suggesting a follow-up




"Opioid Use Disorder" is a victim-blaming epithet. The real disorder is Prohibition Disorder. It is prohibitionists who cause overdoses by refusing to educate, by refusing to ensure safe product, and by denying access to godsend alternatives that could keep an individual from obsessing over the use of one drug in particular and thus developing unwanted dependency.

And how odd it is that we would seek to end dependence on opiates by going to a mental health establishment that thrives on dependency, as seen from the fact that 1 in 4 American women take a Big Pharma drug every day of their life!!!

This is why progress has been so glacial in re-legalizing godsends and ending the War on Drugs. Even the good guys, the guys promoted by the Drug Policy Alliance, are bamboozled in their own way, namely, by materialist and behaviorist dogma. This will not change until Americans realize that it was always a category error to place scientists in charge of mind and mood matters in the first place. That move was predicated on an anti-indigenous and anti-holistic mindset that is patently inappropriate as seen by the fact that it leads to absurd results: namely, a world in which scientists pretend that drugs that inspire and elate have no obvious uses for the depressed, a world in which we behave as if suicide 14 and shock therapy were better than drug use. Hell, drugs that inspire and elate have inspired the creation of the Hindu religion. How can you sit there and tell me with a straight face that we have to do endless clinical studies -- for one "illness" at a time -- before we can tell if such substances can be of help? Clearly, such substances not only CAN be of help, but it is actually the outlawing of religion to keep them from anyone on the absurd grounds that scientists have not yet been able to quantify the effects for the purposes of creating a PowerPoint presentation for the FDA and Big Pharma 15 16 .



Discussion Topics

May 23, 2025

cartoon figures conversing

Attention Teachers and Professors: Brian is not writing these essays for his health. (Well, in a way he is, actually, but that's not important now.) His goal is to get the world thinking about the anti-democratic and anti-scientific idiocy of the War on Drugs. You can stimulate your students' brainwashed grey matter on this topic by having them read the above essay and then discuss the following questions as a group!


  1. Why is mainstream medicine blind to obvious treatments for so-called 'Opioid Use Disorder'?

  2. Explain how laughing gas 17 could help with withdrawal symptoms, albeit in a way that materialist science cannot seem to appreciate.


  3. Why does Brian say he feels 'strongly' about this topic?

  4. Why does the Philosopher say that the mental healthcare industry relies on dependency?

  5. Brian states that 'Opioid Use Disorder' is a victim-blaming epithet. Explain.

  6. What should 'Opioid Use Disorder' actually be called?

  7. How do prohibitionists cause overdoses?

  8. How are 'even the good guys' bamboozled, according to Brian?












Notes for essay entitled Medications for so-called 'opioid-use disorder' are legion: it's just that we have outlawed them all:

1: Nabarun Dasgupta, PhD, MPH UNC Injury Prevention Research Center (up)
2: Drug Policy Alliance (up)
3: How Drug Prohibition makes it impossible to get off of Effexor and other Big Pharma drugs DWP (up)
4: I have been unable to confirm this stat. But the WHO notes clinical recidivism rates for depression ranging from 50% to 85%. Do we count that as a recidivism rate of Effexor? Not when Biopharma is paying 75% of The FDA’s Drug Division Budget, as reported by John LaMattina in the Sep 22, 2022 edition of Forbes magazine. (up)
5: Hall, Wayne, and Megan Weier. 2016. “Lee Robins’ Studies of Heroin Use among US Vietnam Veterans.” Addiction 112 (1): 176–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13584. (up)
6: Richard Louis Miller. 2017. Psychedelic Medicine : The Healing Powers of LSD, MDMA, Psilocybin, and Ayahuasca. Rochester, Vermont: Park Street Press. (up)
7: Shulgin, Alexander T, and Ann Shulgin. 2019. Pihkal : A Chemical Love Story. Berkeley, Ca: Transform Press. (up)
8: James, William. 2016. The Varieties of Religious Experience. Goodreads. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/28820.The_Varieties_of_Religious_Experience. (up)
9: Shulgin, Alexander T, and Ann Shulgin. 2019. Pihkal : A Chemical Love Story. Berkeley, Ca: Transform Press. (up)
10: The Semmelweis Effect in the War on Drugs DWP (up)
11: How psychologists gaslight us about beneficial drug use DWP (up)
12: Drug Prohibition is the Problem, not Drugs: what the movers and shakers get wrong in the drug re-legalization debate DWP (up)
13: How the Drug War Outlaws Religion DWP (up)
14: Why Americans Prefer Suicide to Drug Use DWP (up)
15: Seife, Charles. 2012. “Is Drug Research Trustworthy?” Scientific American 307 (6): 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1212-56. (up)
16: LaMattina, John. n.d. “Why Is Biopharma Paying 75% of the FDA’s Drug Division Budget?” Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2022/09/22/why-is-biopharma-paying-75-of-the-fdas-drug-division-budget/. (up)
17: Forbes Magazine's Laughable Article about Nitrous Oxide DWP (up)




read more essays here





Ten Tweets

against the hateful war on US




Everyone's biggest concern is the economy? Is nobody concerned that Trump has promised to pardon insurrectionists and get revenge on critics? Is no one concerned that Trump taught Americans to doubt democracy by questioning our election fairness before one single vote was cast?

Using the billions now spent on caging users, we could end the whole phenomena of both physical and psychological addiction by using "drugs to fight drugs." But drug warriors do not want to end addiction, they want to keep using it as an excuse to ban drugs.

Proof that materialism is wrong is "in the pudding." It is why scientists are not calling for the use of laughing gas and MDMA by the suicidal. Because they refuse to recognize anything that's obvious. They want their cures to be demonstrated under a microscope.

"My faith votes and strives to outlaw religions that use substances of which politicians disapprove."

If I want to use the kind of drugs that have inspired entire religions, fight depression, or follow up on the research of William James into altered states, I should not have to live in fear of the DEA crashing down my door and shouting: "GO! GO! GO!"

National Geo published an article entitled "Coca: a Blessing and a Curse." Coca was never a curse. Most people used it wisely, just as most people drink wisely. Doctors demonized it because it really worked and it could put them out of business. https://abolishthedea.com/sigmund_freuds_real_breakthrough_was_not_psychoanalysis.php

Being a lifetime patient is not the issue: that could make perfect sense in certain cases. But if I am to be "using" for life, I demand the drug of MY CHOICE, not that of Big Pharma and mainstream psychiatry, who are dogmatically deaf to the benefits of hated substances.

Alcohol is a drug in liquid form. If drug warriors want to punish people who use drugs, they should start punishing themselves.

The Petpedia website says that "German Shepherds need to have challenging jobs such as searching for drugs." How about searching for prohibitionists instead?

Westerners have "just said no" to pain relief, mood elevation and religious insight.


Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow
Book Cover

Break the ice with a sledgehammer: place this book on your coffee table.

This book features 150 annotated images, designed to force brainwashed Americans to confront the fact that drug prohibition is wrong. Here is what author Richard Parrish II says of the book's compiler: "The drug prohibition philosopher provides first-hand, principled, persuasive, and insightful arguments against the current drug prohibition regime..."

Purchase Your Copy
Book Cover

Diary of a Drug Fiend

This is the only full-cast recording of Aleister Crowley's 1922 classic paeon to common sense. It is the first book -- and so far almost the only book -- to stake out a philosophy of drug use that is compatible with human freedom, one in which we learn to use drugs as wisely as possible for the benefit of humanity. This recording was produced by the Drug War Philosopher and your purchases help support his effort to push back against the tragically counterproductive policy of drug prohibition, in the name of human freedom and of humanity's right to heal.

Purchase Your Copy



No cookies, no ads paid for by amoral and immoral billionaires (or trillionaires).


Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.

The Partnership for a Death Free America is a proud sponsor of The Drug War Philosopher website @ abolishthedea.com.


Copyright 2026, Brian Ballard Quass Contact: quass@quass.com

tombstone for American Democracy, 1776-2024, RIP (up)