The Drug War Mindset

• War is good.



• Right wing "ends" justify any "means" in South America.



• It's okay to torture our enemies.



• Developing thermonuclear bombs makes sense.



• Folks can be hounded out of society for non-crimes, like being communists.



• Natural Law and due process can be overruled in "drugs" cases.



• We can bomb "them" into submission



• Treaties with native populations are meant to be broken.



• Thermonuclear bombs were worth pursuing.



• Concern for civil and human rights stops at our border.


It's no surprise therefore that those who hold this mindset are opposed to drug re-legalization . Empathogenic drugs like psilocybin and MDMA could bring us all together and make these politicians, and their politics, irrelevant. That's why the powers that be feed us the unscientific lie that godsend medicines have no positive uses whatsoever, for anyone, ever.





Author's Follow-up:

May 29, 2025






This two-year-old post captures a truth about the Drug War that almost no one notices: namely, that there is method to the madness of the Drug Warrior. The Drug War is not just a bunch of bad laws. It is just one of many bad ideas flowing from the pathological mindset of an insecure westerner.

Who is the Drug Warrior, after all?

The Drug Warrior is a bigoted hypochondriac who reacts to ALL perceived problems with simplistic, short-sighted and ultimately counterproductive initiatives. These are the guys who sold guns to seemingly friendly nations during the Cold War, never stopping to think that those countries might someday become enemies and use those weapons on us; these are the guys who "saved" white American "junior" from himself by creating the Mafia and drug cartels that would kill minorities and foreigners; these are the guys who selfishly insist on economic growth at all costs, heedless of the fact that we are leaving our descendants with a toxic Earth, like so many opportunistic butlers making off with the family jewels; these are the guys who "protected" our country in the 20th century by amassing thousands of thermonuclear weapons, completely oblivious to the obvious fact that such weapons would someday be aimed at ourselves.

The Drug War is just one symptom of a pathological western mindset that includes the following traits:

1) selfishness

2) simple-mindedness

3) an inability to wait for deferred gratification

4) an inability to recognize, let alone to act on, principles

5) a visceral hatred of political foes

6) a callous indifference to the rights of their own descendants to live on a clean and thriving planet

Okay, so that's the diagnosis. What is the cure? How do we eradicate this grade-school mindset from American politics?

We need to establish a new social norm, one in which political discussion between supposed adversaries actually takes place -- one in which the only unforgivable sin is our hatred of "the other." We need, in short, to start using drugs for human benefit. Clearly, that is our only hope for saving a species which is on the brink of self-destruction because of its penchant for fearing rather than understanding.

We need to stop censoring reports of positive drug use and to start emulating them instead.

What positive reports of drug use? Consider the following user reports from "Pihkal,"¹ reports that reveal the great potential for strategic drug use to help bring the world together in peace and understanding.



"I am experiencing more deeply than ever before the importance of acknowledging and deeply honoring each human being. And I was able to go through and resolve some judgments with particular persons."

"I believe that it would be impossible to harm anything. To commit an overt harmful or painful act on anyone or anything is beyond one's capabilities."

"I felt less of a need to talk, but the intimate closeness with the others was maintained."

" All the next day I felt like 'a citizen of the universe' rather than a citizen of the planet."




Such results were not just achieved in drug trials. Such drug-inspired feelings resulted in unprecedented peace, love and understanding on the British dance floors in the 1990s, as is clear from the following quotes from DJs of that time²:




"It was the first time that black-and-white people had integrated on a level... and everybody was one." -- DJ Ray Keith.

"It was black and white, Asian, Chinese, all up in one building," -- MC GQ.

"Everyone's loving each other, man, they're not hating." - DJ Mampi Swift.




Naturally, the British authorities saw no benefit in peace, love and understanding. In response to these love fests, they cracked down on the use of Ecstasy, and what was the result? The dance floors erupted into such alcohol-fueled violence that concert organizers had to bring in special forces troops to keep the peace. Special forces. Another "victory" for the harebrained Drug Warrior.

CONCLUSION

The sensible mindset toward drugs would come about naturally if the western world embraced just two principles.

1) The only people whom we should mistrust and fear are haters.

2) Opponents on political matters must "engage" with their adversaries in a spirit of peace, each recognizing the humanity of the other.


Regarding principle 1: Haters would be scorned and stigmatized in a free world. Why? Because we would all know that there are drugs that the haters could have used wisely in order to stop being haters. The fact that they fail to do so would render them stigmatized in a sane world. Why? Because we would consider hatred like body odor, as something that a person is responsible for insofar as everyone knows that remedies for the condition are ready to hand.

Regarding principle 2: In the utopian world that I am attempting to evoke here, we would insist as a kind of social norm that pundits must regularly demonstrate their ability to chat amicably with their political opponents as a condition of that pundit being taken seriously. This second principle would help bridge the enormous divide in modern politics, where both "sides" talk only to themselves. Note that this problem seems incurable (at least to any self-styled "realist") until we finally start recognizing the increasingly obvious power of drugs to inspire compassion, patience, and understanding.

Note that I am not getting on any high horse here. I myself could clearly benefit from the wise use of empathogens to help me get my views across to my opponents viz. the imperative for drug re-legalization ³ . When passionate "sober" minds meet, a discussion like that can quickly devolve into a shouting match. Not so when we place the humanity of our opponents front and center with the help of empathogens and thereby work with them constructively to achieve understanding, if not actual agreement.










Notes for essay entitled The Drug War Mindset:

1: Shulgin, Alexander T, and Ann Shulgin. 2019. Pihkal : A Chemical Love Story. Berkeley, Ca: Transform Press. (up)
2: How the Drug War killed Leah Betts DWP (up)
3: “National Coalition for Drug Legalization.” n.d. National Coalition for Drug Legalization. https://www.nationalcoalitionfordruglegalization.org/. (up)




read more essays here







Ten Tweets

against the hateful war on US




The FDA should have no role in approving psychoactive medicine. They evaluate them based on materialist standards rather than holistic ones. In practice, this means the FDA ignores all glaringly obvious benefits.

The UN of today is in an odd position regarding drugs: they want to praise indigenous societies while yet outlawing the drugs that helped create them.

When we outlaw drugs, we are outlawing far more than drugs. We are suppressing freedom of religion and academic research.

Thomas Szasz was not an extremist when it comes to drugs. The extremists are those who feel that psychiatrists know more about our mind and mood than we do.

The Drug Warriors say: "Don't tread on me! (That said, please continue to tell me what plants I can use, how much pain relief I can get, and whether my religion is true or not.)"

I wonder if Nixon knew what a favor he was doing medical capitalism when he outlawed psychedelics. Those drugs can actually cure things, and there's no money in that.

Americans heap hypocritical praise on Walt Whitman. What they don't realize is that many of us could be "Walt Whitman for a Day" with the wise use of psychoactive drugs. To the properly predisposed, morphine gives a DEEP appreciation of Mother Nature.

That's so "drug war" of Rick: If a psychoactive substance has a bad use at some dose, for somebody, then it must not be used at any dose by anybody. It's hard to imagine a less scientific proposition, or one more likely to lead to unnecessary suffering.

America is an "arrestocracy" thanks to the war on drugs.

Americans HATE big government -- and yet they have no problem with government using drug prohibition to control their pain relief and how and how much they can think and feel in this life.


Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us








Break the ice with a sledgehammer: place this book on your coffee table.
This book features 150 annotated images, designed to force brainwashed Americans to confront the fact that drug prohibition is wrong. Here is what author Richard Parrish II says of the book's compiler: "The drug prohibition philosopher provides first-hand, principled, persuasive, and insightful arguments against the current drug prohibition regime..."
Purchase Your Copy

Diary of a Drug Fiend
This is the only full-cast recording of Aleister Crowley's 1922 classic paeon to common sense. It is the first book -- and so far almost the only book -- to stake out a philosophy of drug use that is compatible with human freedom, one in which we learn to use drugs as wisely as possible for the benefit of humanity. This recording was produced by the Drug War Philosopher and your purchases help support his effort to push back against the tragically counterproductive policy of drug prohibition, in the name of human freedom and of humanity's right to heal.
Purchase Your Copy



No cookies, no ads paid for by amoral and immoral billionaires (or trillionaires).


Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.


The Partnership for a Death Free America is a proud sponsor of The Drug War Philosopher website @ abolishthedea.com.


Copyright 2026, Brian Ballard Quass Contact: quass@quass.com

(up)